Frontiers for Young Minds

Frontiers for Young Minds
Core Concept Neuroscience and Psychology Collection Article Published: April 12, 2022

Watch and Learn: Athletes Can Improve by Observing the Actions of Others


Athletes spend a lot of time and effort practicing skills to get better at their sports. In addition to physical practice, athletes can use a technique called action observation to help themselves improve. Action observation is the process of watching movement. Humans naturally learn how to perform movements by watching the movements of other people. For example, from an early age, children learn important skills such as walking, throwing, and kicking by seeing other people perform those actions. Research has shown that watching movements activates similar parts of the brain to those that are involved in performing movement. This means watching sports performance might help athletes improve by strengthening the brain areas used when actions are performed. Coaches and sport psychologists use action observation methods, such as live demonstrations and video footage, to help athletes improve their techniques, develop their confidence, and get better at their sports.

What Is Action Observation?

Humans spend a lot of time watching other people and watching actually helps us to learn how to do new things. If you think back to when you were a small child, you learnt how to walk, run, kick a ball, and throw a frisbee by watching your friends, siblings, parents, and grandparents doing those actions. This is action observation! Scientists have discovered that action observation can help people learn new movements or get better at sports [1]. Nowadays, smartphones have excellent cameras for video recording, making it really easy for coaches or sport psychologists to record high-quality videos of athletes performing, which can then be used as part of their training. As a result, coaches and sport psychologists have explored different types, delivery methods, and uses of action observation with athletes.

Why Does Action Observation Work?

There is a famous saying, “monkey see, monkey do.” This saying applies to a scientific discovery of action observation in monkeys, one of the closest animal relatives to humans. In 1992, an influential group of Italian scientists conducted an experiment to try to understand the brain activity of monkeys when they performed actions with various objects [2]. The scientists happened to notice changes in the monkeys’ brain activity when they watched the scientist picking up the objects and placing them inside a box; so, the scientists adjusted their experiment to also look at the brain activity that happened when monkeys were watching the scientist performing movements. To the scientists’ surprise, brain cells called neurons, in an area of the monkeys’ brains that is involved in planning movements, were activated both when the monkeys performed movements and when the monkeys watched the scientist perform the same movements. The scientists called these neurons mirror neurons, to indicate that the monkeys’ brain activity during action observation “mirrored” the brain activity recorded when they performed the same movements.

Scientists proposed that humans might also have similar brain activity when they are observing and performing movements. Thousands of experiments have explored the brain areas involved in action observation in humans. A recent study analyzed data from all the research that used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) during action observation and movement execution [3]. fMRI is a brain scanning technique that detects changes in blood flow to specific areas of the brain, which indicates the amount of brain activity. This study collected fMRI data from 595 action observation experiments and 142 movement execution experiments, which included a combined total of 13,334 participants! The researchers identified two brain areas that are involved in both action observation and movement execution in humans (Figure 1). The first area, called the premotor cortex, is located in the center of the brain and is involved in planning movements. The second area, called the parietal lobe, is positioned toward the back of the brain and is involved in copying movements and the feelings associated with movements. So, it does in fact seem that action observation activates the human brain in a similar way to the mirror neurons that were discovered in monkeys. These findings suggest that repeated use of action observation by athletes might produce similar changes in the brain to physical practice, leading to improved sport performance!

Figure 1 - Locations of brain areas that are activated during both action observation and performance of movements.
  • Figure 1 - Locations of brain areas that are activated during both action observation and performance of movements.
  • The premotor cortex (blue) is involved in planning movements. The parietal lobe (red) is involved in copying movements and the feelings associated with movements (Figure based on [3]).

Does Action Observation Work in Sports?

Watching another athlete performing is only useful if the watching athletes have a reason to be interested in what they are viewing. Athletes are often interested in watching other athletes because they always need to perform at their best. Athletes must outperform others to be selected for a team or to win a competition. This means that athletes are constantly trying to improve their skills during training or perform their skills well during competition. Action observation can help with both [4].

One scientific article on action observation in sport showed that action observation can be beneficial in sports in which athletes compete as individuals [4]. For example, action observation helped inexperienced golfers putt the ball closer to a target hole and helped youth gymnasts achieve higher judge ratings for their gymnastics routines. This scientific article also reported similar positive outcomes for individual athletes in team sports [4]. For example, action observation helped skilled volleyball players improve their serving accuracy and helped low-skilled basketball players increase the number of free throws they scored. Athletes have also been shown to move with greater quality, speed, and force after using action observation [4]. Overall, using action observation together with physical practice can help athletes perform a skill better than if they only physically practiced that skill. This is good news for athletes and coaches, as action observation is easy to use and can produce big improvements in sport performance.

Action observation also has psychological benefits for athletes [4]. Sport skills are like a jigsaw puzzle: when the pieces are put together in the correct order, the puzzle (or skill) works perfectly, but if something is out of place, the entire thing breaks down. Athletes can use action observation to link the different parts of a skill together so they can perform it well. Action observation can also help athletes overcome some of the negative thoughts and feelings they experience when they perform badly during training or competition [4]. In these situations, it is common for athletes to feel less motivated or lack confidence. Watching video footage of their own previous successful performances can remind athletes that they can perform well [4]. For example, if a soccer player is not feeling confident after missing a penalty shot in a big game, watching videos of times when they previously scored important penalties can help them feel more confident when preparing to take a similar shot again.

How Should Athletes Use Action Observation?

Action observation should target the specific needs of athletes (Figure 2). For beginner athletes, the coach should provide frequent demonstrations of a skill. It is helpful for athletes if the coach explains the different parts of the skill during the demonstration. Once athletes get better at the skill, it is useful for them to see a video of what it looks like when they perform the skill themselves. This allows them to compare their own movements with those in the demonstration. Normal speed and slow-motion video footage of the movements could both be used, as slow-motion video can help athletes see the technique more easily. Once athletes become even more skilled, they should be allowed to decide when they think action observation would best benefit their physical practice of the skill.

Figure 2 - Action observation involves watching a video of a movement, such as kicking a ball.
  • Figure 2 - Action observation involves watching a video of a movement, such as kicking a ball.
  • Athletes can watch footage of others or of themselves. The movements being performed can be successful or unsuccessful attempts. The decision to use videos of self vs. other and success vs. failure should be based on the skill level of the athletes and the specific reasons they are using action observation.

Skilled athletes may use action observation slightly differently than beginners do. They will probably watch videos of their own performances rather than demonstrations by others because they already know how to perform the skill well and have developed their own way of performing it over time. Skilled athletes will watch videos that include both successful and unsuccessful performances of the skill, which will help them continue to improve by identifying the differences in technique between good and bad attempts.


Action observation is part of everyday life and involves watching others or oneself moving. Action observation helps with performance of sports skills because it activates similar brain areas to those active when athletes physically perform those skills. Action observation can also help athletes with important psychological factors, such as confidence. Athletes of different skill levels should use various forms of action observation to improve their performance. Overall, action observation combined with physical practice is an excellent way to help athletes of all skill levels to get better at their sports.


Action Observation: Watching oneself or another person performing a movement, either live or on video.

Neurons: Nerve cells that make up the human brain and nervous system.

Mirror Neurons: Brain cells that are activated during both action observation and physical performance of the same movement.

Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A brain scanning technique that measures changes in blood flow to different areas of the brain, which are then interpreted as a marker of brain activity.

Premotor Cortex: Part of the frontal lobe located in the upper center area of the brain that is involved in movement planning.

Parietal Lobe: A brain lobe located in the upper rear area of the brain that processes sensory information such as taste, temperature, and touch.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


The authors would like to thank Rebecca Bruton for reading the manuscript and providing helpful comments based on her experience as a class teacher, Early Year’s lead and Assistant Head in a Primary School setting in the UK. This improved the readability of the manuscript for school children aged 8–15 years.


[1] Neuman, B., and Gray, R. 2013. A direct comparison of the effects of imagery and action observation on hitting performance. Mov. Sport Sci. Sci. Motricité 79:11–21. doi: 10.1051/sm/2012034

[2] di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V., and Rizzolatti, G. 1992. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Exp. Brain Res. 91:176–80.

[3] Hardwick, R. M., Caspers, S., Eickhoff, S. B., and Swinnen, S. P. 2018. Neural correlates of action: comparing meta-analyses of imagery, observation, and execution. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 94:31–44. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.08.003

[4] Ste-Marie, D. M., Law, B., Rymal, A. M., O. J., Hall, C., and McCullagh, P. 2012. Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: an applied model for the use of observation. Int. Rev. Sport Exerc. Psychol. 5:145–76. doi: 10.1080/1750984X.2012.665076