Abstract
Comparable to carbon dioxide, dimethyl sulfide (DMS), and carbon monoxide (CO) are tiny gases that have a great impact on our climate. Though occurring only in very small amounts in the atmosphere they are climate influencers, especially in the Arctic. The Arctic is a unique place on Earth where all life is adapted to the extreme cold. Therefore, global warming is a great threat to the Arctic. DMS and CO are produced in the Arctic Ocean and can go into the atmosphere. There, CO may enhance the warming of the Arctic. On the other hand, DMS possibly cools the atmosphere because it helps forming clouds. The processes CO and DMS are involved in, are complex and will probably alter under a changing climate. It is important to understand these processes to get an idea of the future Arctic Ocean and climate to find ways to save the Arctic.
Tiny Gases Make a Difference!
That sounds funny at first glance but, looking more closely, this is not only true when we are in an elevator realizing someone had beans for lunch. It is also true for so-called trace gases. Trace gases occur in our atmosphere in very small amounts. But do not be fooled: they influence Earth’s climate in a big way, namely through their behaviors and interactions. This is especially true in the Arctic Ocean, one of the most impressive, yet vulnerable, places on Earth. You have probably heard of carbon dioxide, since it is one of the key drivers for climate change—the star influencer among trace gases. But have you heard of carbon monoxide and dimethyl sulfide? They are further influencers—trace gases whose forces we should not overlook. Here comes their story. Where do they come from? How powerful are they and will they influence the future of the Arctic? On Instagram, we follow influencers and let them affect our behavior. Why do not we take trace gases as an inspiring example, too? Even though we may feel tiny when facing this overwhelming climate problem, our individual behavior makes a difference!
What Do We Mean by Tiny?
As the name trace gases indicates, these gases only occur in the air in very small (trace) amounts. You may already know that the air we breathe consists mainly of nitrogen and oxygen, so these are not considered trace gases. All trace gases together make up <1% of the atmosphere. Carbon monoxide and dimethyl sulfide are only two of several trace gases, thus they represent an even tinier fraction (Figure 1). We might conclude that a small fraction means a small impact; so we may think that trace gases are not very important. However, this is not true at all! Carbon dioxide (CO2) is a trace gas, too. Its properties, in combination with its increasing concentration in the atmosphere, keep the warmth of sunlight trapped close to the Earth longer, so that the Earth warms up. This is similar to the way a greenhouse allows tomatoes to grow, even in wintertime, so we call it the greenhouse effect. The greenhouse effect is so strong that it influences the entire world’s climate. But what about carbon monoxide and dimethyl sulfide? In the rest of this article, we will explain the influence of these important trace gases on the Earth’s climate.
What is Carbon Monoxide and Where is It Found?
#Climateinfluencer #Indirectgreenhousegas #Oceanproduct #Interactionlover
Carbon monoxide (CO) mainly occurs where things are burning. You may have heard that CO is a dangerous gas that can be poisonous at certain levels. Most CO comes from the burning of fuels, such as petrol. However, scientists found out that the ocean contains a lot of CO, too. In the ocean, floating dead plant material and tiny marine algae, called phytoplankton, react with sunlight to produce CO [1]. The amounts of CO produced at certain areas of the ocean’s surface can become so large that it goes into the atmosphere. That is why scientists call the ocean a source of atmospheric CO—#oceanproduct.
How does CO behave in the atmosphere? As you can see from Figure 2, CO is a simple molecule. It consists only of one carbon and one oxygen atom. However, because of its properties, it likes interacting and reacting with other molecules in the air. That is what characterizes its influence -#interactionlover. Once CO is released into the air, its favorite reaction partners are hydroxyl molecules (OH⋅). This means that OH⋅ is CO’s best friend and they love to interact with each other. In their interaction, CO rapidly takes up the oxygen atom of OH⋅. Hence, that gives CO + O. Any idea what that forms? Exactly: CO2–a greenhouse gas.
OH⋅ molecules are often called the cleanser of the atmosphere, because OH⋅ can react with and destroy many atmospheric compounds, including some dangerous ones. For example, OH⋅ also reacts with methane (CH4), another trace gas and a powerful greenhouse gas like CO2. When OH⋅ reacts with CH4, the danger of CH4 is invalidated. However, OH⋅ likes reacting with CO much more. Thus, if CO is present, it takes away OH⋅, the potential reaction partner of CH4, and prolongs the time CH4 stays in the atmosphere [2]. That enhances the harmful warming effect of CH4 on the atmosphere. So, CO causes a chain reaction that in turn leads to warming. That is why CO is called an #indirect greenhouse gas—an influencer of the climate.
At this point, it may be clearer to you why we care how much CO is produced in remote oceanic areas, such as the Arctic Ocean. The Arctic Ocean is less influenced by land-produced CO than many other areas of the world, simply because the surrounding land is not so densely populated. The release of CO from the Arctic Ocean into the atmosphere could make a difference for the Arctic climate. Does this mean there is no good news for the Arctic Ocean? The question is, are there other influencer molecules that might counteract the effect of the CO that is released from the ocean? Now DMS comes into play.
What is Dimethyl Sulfide and Where is It Found?
#climateinfluencer #sulfurcontainer #cloudcreater #biologicalproduct
Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is a simple molecule, too. It consists of two methyl groups at its ends and one sulfur atom in its center—#sulfurcontainer. A methyl group is a carbon atom binding three hydrogen atoms. However, the sulfur atom makes the molecule special: sulfur is needed for all living organisms to build proteins and other key components of their cells. In the ocean, DMS is produced by phytoplankton and bacteria [3]—#biologicalproduct. Hence, through DMS production, sulfur becomes available to other organisms. However, like CO, DMS can be released from the ocean into the atmosphere. And there, its sulfur plays another central role!
When released into the atmosphere, DMS can help to create clouds. Once DMS is in the air, it also reacts with OH⋅ and makes cloud-forming particles called cloud condensation nuclei. You can picture a cloud condensation nucleus (CCN) as a very small particle that acts like a seed—a seed for a cloud that will grow around it—#cloudcreater. You have probably noticed that the more clouds there are in the sky, the less sunlight reaches us on the ground. The clouds reflect the sunlight back to space, and less sunlight at the Earth’s surface means the surface gets cooler. Scientists call this cloud formation theory the CLAW hypothesis, which is summarized as follows: marine phytoplankton can cool the Earth by producing DMS, and consequently, clouds [4] —#climateinfluencer. It is crucial that we find out if the CLAW theory is true for remote areas, like the Arctic Ocean, which are especially threatened by warming. That is why we want to study DMS production and all related processes very carefully in the Arctic Ocean.
Why is the Arctic Ocean So Important?
Cooler areas of the Earth can warm faster than areas that are already relatively warm. Scientists have seen that the Arctic region, therefore, is warming much faster than other regions of the world. This is important because the Arctic region plays an important role in global weather and climate. The Gulf Stream is a good example of the Arctic’s influence. The Gulf Stream is an ocean current that brings warmth from the tropics to Europe and is thus responsible for the mild climate in Europe. The Gulf Stream’s main driving force is seawater from the Arctic, which is very cold and salty. Cold, salty seawater is so heavy and dense that it sinks down to the ocean bottom, resulting in major water movement, kind of like a pump. Now imagine that the Arctic Ocean’s temperature and salt content change. The melting of Arctic ice due to the ongoing warming of the Arctic will add loads of fresh water, which contains less salt than seawater. This warmer, fresher water will not sink like cold, salty water, and this change could weaken the Gulf Stream. Changes to the Gulf Stream would not only affect the Arctic itself, but could have consequences for other places in the world too, such as Europe.
So, you can see that it makes sense to investigate the many consequences of climate change in the Arctic, to learn from them, and to determine how these changes might affect other areas of Earth. Moreover, we need this information to predict how weather and climate will behave in the future—how our world will look when you are 90. By predicting the future climate, we can hopefully find ways to adapt to the changes or even find solutions to stop them.
How Will Co and DMS Influence the Future of the Arctic Ocean and Our Climate?
We all know that the Earth is getting warmer, especially the Arctic Ocean. Thinking of the interactions we have just discussed, the picture becomes clear: environmental changes like climate warming and melting ice can affect the production and release of CO and DMS in the Arctic Ocean [5, 6]. However, we also saw how complex the production and release processes of DMS and CO are. That is why we are uncertain whether CO and DMS in the Arctic Ocean will become more or less abundant and, in turn, whether that would cool or further warm the Arctic atmosphere (Figure 3).
Finally, we explained that what happens in the Arctic Ocean does not necessarily stay in the Arctic Ocean, but these changes can affect the rest of the world’s climate. Therefore, it is extremely important to continue to investigate the behavior of climate-relevant trace gases like CO and DMS in the Arctic, under different future scenarios. Even though trace gases occur in tiny amounts, they still make a big difference.
Glossary
Trace Gases: ↑ Gases that make up together <1% of our atmosphere (Figure 1).
Arctic Ocean: ↑ The Arctic Ocean includes the North Pole region and is surrounded by northern parts of Europe and Asia and North America. It is the coldest, smallest and shallowest ocean compared to the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian, and Southern Oceans. Polar bears live in the Arctic region but there are no penguins.
Carbon Monoxide: ↑ A less known trace gas that has the potential to enhance global warming.
Dimethyl Sulfide: ↑ A gas that possibly cools the atmosphere by helping to form clouds.
Greenhouse Effect: ↑ The burning of oil and gas releases certain trace gases. Some of those gases are acting as greenhouse gases and accumulate in the atmosphere of the Earth. Like a greenhouse, they keep more warmth of the sunlight in the atmosphere, which leads to global warming.
Phytoplankton: ↑ Tiny, floating marine algae that are the base of all life in the ocean.
Cloud Condensation Nucleus: ↑ A particle in the air that acts like a seed for cloud formation. Around it a cloud can grow.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Mehmet C. Köse for providing Figures 1, 2. This work is a contribution to the PETRA project (FKZ 03F0808A) which was funded by UKRI-NERC and BMBF as part of the Changing Arctic Ocean programme.
Footnote
1. ↑ Volume of an Olympic-size swimming pool: 50 × 25 × 2 m = 2,500 m3 = 2,500,000 liters. Fraction of CO in the atmosphere: 10-7 = 0.0000001. Volume of ink required to obtain the same fraction in the pool: 0.0000001 × 2,500,000 liters = 0.25 liters, i.e., an ordinary drinking glass (250 mL) filled with ink.
References
[1] ↑ Stubbins, A., Uher, G., Law, C. S., Mopper, K., Robinson, C., Upstill-Goddard, R. C. 2006. Open-ocean carbon monoxide photoproduction. Deep Sea Res. II Top. Stud. Oceanogr. 53:1695–705. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2006.05.011
[2] ↑ Conte, L., Szopa, S., Séférian, R., and Bopp, L. 2019. The oceanic cycle of carbon monoxide and its emissions to the atmosphere. Biogeosciences 16:881–902. doi: 10.5194/bg-16-881-2019
[3] ↑ Lovelock, J. E., Maggs, R. J., and Rasmussen, R. A. 1972. Atmospheric dimethyl sulfide and the natural sulfur cycle. Nature 237:452–3.
[4] ↑ Charlson, R. J, Lovelock, J. E., Andreae, M. O., and Warren, S. G. 1987. Oceanic phytoplankton, atmospheric sulfur, cloud albedo and climate. Nature 326:655–61.
[5] ↑ Levasseur, M. 2013. Impact of Arctic meltdown on the microbial cycling of sulfur. Nat. Geosci. 6:691–700. doi: 10.1038/ngeo1910
[6] ↑ Tran, S., Bonsang, B., Gros, V., Peeken, I., Sarda-Esteve, R., Bernhardt, A., et al. 2013. A survey of carbon monoxide and non-methane hydrocarbons in the Arctic Ocean during summer 2010. Biogeosciences 10:1909–35. doi: 10.5194/bg-10-1909-2013