New Discovery Earth Sciences Collection Article Published: June 26, 2026

Can We Produce Rice Without Harming Our Planet?

Abstract

Rice feeds more than half of the world’s population, but growing rice requires a large amount of land, water, energy, and chemicals such as fertilizers, which can affect the environment. Scientists use the idea of planetary boundaries—Earth’s safe environmental limits—to understand whether food production stays within limits the planet can handle. In our study, we used a planetary boundary-based method to explore how rice production affects climate, water resources, and nutrient pollution. Results showed that current rice farming often exceeds safe limits in several areas. However, there are many things farmers, researchers, and governments can do to help. By working together, we can continue producing rice while protecting the planet that grows it.

Rice: One of the World’s Favorite Staple Foods

Have you eaten rice today? If yes, you are among the 50% people around the world who have done so. Rice is one of the most common staple foods on Earth. People in Asia, Africa, and South America eat it almost every day, and millions of farmers depend on it for their livelihoods. But growing rice uses a lot water, energy, and agrochemicals, and it also releases gases that harm the planet [1]. Scientists are asking an important question: Can we keep growing enough rice to feed everyone without pushing Earth beyond its ability to heal? This question has to do with sustainability, which means meeting today’s needs without harming the planet.

The world’s population is growing fast. By 2050, there could be about 10 billion people on Earth [2]. That means farmers will need to produce more food than they do today. Yet, our planet’s natural systems are already under stress, and increasing rice production will add to that. We clearly need rice for food, but we also need a healthy planet. So, how do we balance both?

What are Planetary Boundaries?

To answer this question, scientists use the idea of planetary boundaries [3]. Think of planetary boundaries as Earth’s safety limits, showing us the lines we should not cross if we want our planet to stay stable and livable. Imagine Earth as a giant house. Inside, we can cook, clean, and move around, but if we knock down the roof or use all the water, the house will not be livable anymore. Planetary boundaries work the same way: they define the limits of how much we can take or change before causing lasting damage to the Earth.

There are nine known planetary boundaries (Figure 1), but four are especially important for food systems: climate change (how much increase in temperature can be tolerated); freshwater use (how much clean water can safely be used); land use (how much of Earth’s land can be used for farming); and nutrient cycles (how much nitrogen and phosphorus can be added to the environment). If our food production systems stay within these limits, we are living sustainably. If we go beyond them, we risk tipping Earth’s systems into danger zones.

Infographic showing the connections among global warming, land use, water use, freshwater eutrophication, and marine water eutrophication with their impacts on earth system processes such as climate change, biosphere integrity, land system change, freshwater change, biogeochemical flows, ocean acidification, atmospheric aerosol loading, stratospheric ozone depletion, and novel entities. Risk levels are depicted with colored segments from safe operating space to high risk zone.
  • Figure 1 - Color codes (just like traffic signals) can illustrate the idea of planetary boundaries.
  • The center green circle shows conditions that remain within Earth’s safe operating space, meaning human activities are still sustainable. Yellow represents increasing risk, where pressure on the environment is growing. Red indicates a boundary has been exceeded, meaning the planet’s natural systems may be under serious stress. These colors help us quickly see where the Earth system is operating safely and where improvements are needed. Boxes on the left represent the impacts of rice production that need to be addressed to keep it sustainable, and the planetary boundaries they affect.

Planetary Boundary–Based Life Cycle Assessment

Scientists study the environmental burdens of rice production using a method called life cycle assessment (LCA) [4]. LCA looks at all the steps in a product’s life, from start to finish, and adds up how much environmental impact each step produces.

Figure 2 shows the life cycle of rice. First, farmers prepare rice fields by leveling the land and building small soil walls, called bunds, around each field to hold water. Irrigation channels allow water to enter and leave the field in a controlled way. The soil becomes flooded, which helps rice grow and reduces weeds. Next, seedlings are planted and farmers manage water levels throughout the growing season. Fertilizers and other agrochemicals are applied carefully to support plant growth. Finally, when the rice matures, the crop is harvested, dried, transported to rice mills, and processed into the white rice we eat. Each stage uses energy and resources and contributes to environmental impacts.

Circular diagram illustrating the stages of rice production with labeled images: field preparation, irrigation, planting, fertilizing, harvesting, and processing, surrounding a central bowl of rice representing the final product.
  • Figure 2 - The life cycle of rice, from field preparation to final processing.
  • (Figure credit: Pexels [various authors]).

Scientists combine all this environmental burden information to understand the total environmental footprint of rice production. A novel approach called planetary boundary-based life cycle assessment (PB-LCA) goes one step further than traditional LCA [1]. Instead of only measuring impacts, it compares the impacts with Earth’s environmental limits using scientific models and global environmental data (Figure 1). In simple terms, PB-LCA asks not only “How much impact occurs?” but also “Is this amount safe for the planet?” PB-LCA can also be applied to other foods, energy systems, fuels, and industrial products, helping people understand their sustainability. In our case, PB-LCA helped to answer the question: Is rice production still within the planet’s safe zone, or have we crossed it?

What Scientists Found: When Rice Farming Crosses the Line

When scientists used PB-LCA to evaluate the environmental profile of rice production, they learned several important things. For instance, flooded rice fields emit significant greenhouse gases, particularly methane contributing to climate change. Methane is produced by tiny microbes that live in waterlogged soil and break down organic matter in the absence of oxygen. In addition, rice is one of the most water-thirsty crops, raising serious concerns related to the freshwater planetary boundary. Furthermore, irrigation depends on groundwater, which is a limited resource, and on diesel-powered pumps, which use fossil fuels.

Fertilizers rich in nitrogen and phosphorus help rice grow but can leak into water bodies and cause eutrophication, which is an overgrowth of algae that reduces oxygen and kills aquatic life. This can also affect the natural cycle of biogeochemical flows, specifically the nitrogen and phosphorus cycles. Eutrophication can occur in both freshwater and marine environments, but they affect different ecosystems. Freshwater eutrophication happens in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs when nutrients from fertilizers enter inland waters, often causing rapid algae growth that reduces oxygen and harms fish and aquatic plants. Marine eutrophication occurs when these nutrients eventually reach coastal seas and oceans, where they can create large algal blooms and “dead zones” with very low oxygen levels. Scientists study these separately because freshwater and marine systems respond differently to nutrient pollution and require different management solutions.

Rice farming covers huge areas, but compared to other impacts, land use often stays within safe boundaries. Overall, scientists found that the climate, freshwater, and nutrient-related boundaries of the planet were being exceeded by current rice-production practices. That means the way we currently grow rice is not fully sustainable. To put it simply: rice helps feed billions, but its production is straining our planet’s limits.

Can We Fix It? Smarter Ways to Grow Rice

The good news is that scientists, farmers, and policymakers are already working on solutions. For example, instead of keeping fields flooded all the time, farmers can let them dry for a few days before re-flooding, which is called the alternate wetting and drying method. This simple change can cut methane emissions significantly and reduce water use without decreasing the amount of rice grown. Applying fertilizers at the right time and in the right amounts helps plants absorb nutrients efficiently, while also reducing pollution and saving farmers money. Replacing diesel pumps with solar-powered systems can drastically reduce carbon emissions while lowering fuel costs. Planting rice varieties that grow faster or produce more grains means fewer resources are needed.

In short, each of these solutions directly helps to reduce pressure on planetary boundaries. For example, by lowering methane emissions, alternate wetting and drying helps the climate change-related boundary. Efficient fertilizer protects water ecosystems. Solar irrigation reduces fossil fuel use, supporting climate stability. By connecting farming practices to planetary boundaries, these approaches, sometimes called climate-smart agriculture, help move rice farming back inside Earth’s safe zone.

Why This Matters: A Sustainable Future for our Planet

Rice is more than just a crop. It is part of our global story. From the terraces of the Philippines to the deltas of Africa, rice connects cultures, families, and ecosystems. But that connection also gives us responsibility. If we want future generations to enjoy life as we do today, we must find ways to grow our food responsibly using fewer vital resources, fewer chemicals, and cleaner energy. Every small step matters. Farmers can adopt new techniques, scientists can develop better tools, governments can support sustainable policies, and students can learn about these challenges and become the next generation of environmental problem solvers. When we care for the planet, we care for our food, our health, and each other. So next time you eat a bowl of rice, take a moment to think about the incredible journey it took and how, together, we can make that journey more sustainable—because the story of rice is really the story of our planet’s future.

Glossary

Agrochemicals: Any chemical, such as a fertilizer or a pesticide, used in agriculture to increase crop production and protect plants.

Sustainability: The condition of meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.

Planetary Boundaries: A scientific framework identifying nine global processes, such as climate change and biodiversity loss, crucial for maintaining Earth’s stability.

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA): A scientific method that measures environmental burdens associated with a product, service, or system across its entire life cycle.

Irrigation: The process of applying water to soil or land to assist in the growth of crops, landscapes, and plants.

Planetary Boundary–based Life Cycle Assessment: A method that evaluates whether a product or activity is sustainable by comparing its total environmental impact to the Earth’s physical limits.

Greenhouse Gases: Gases like carbon dioxide (CO2) and methane (CH4) that trap heat in the atmosphere.

Eutrophication: When too many nutrients enter water, causing rapid algae growth that blocks sunlight and reduces oxygen, making it difficult for fish and other aquatic life to survive.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This article is adopted from the work, which was supported by King Mongkut’s University of Technology Thonburi (KMUTT) through Petchra Pra Jom Klao Research Scholarship (KMUTT–NSTDA). The Joint Graduate School of Energy and Environment (JGSEE), the National Science and Technology Development Agency (NSTDA), and the Ministry of Higher Education, Science, Research, and Innovation (MHESI) are also acknowledged.

AI Tool Statement

The author(s) declared that Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. We acknowledge using Grammarly, QuillBot, and ChatGPT to enhance the clarity, grammar, and coherence of the writing while ensuring that the ideas are entirely our own.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.


Original Source Article

Mahmood, A., Ghani, H. U., and Gheewala, S. H. 2023. Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of rice in Pakistan using a planetary boundary-based approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 39:123–33. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.05.016


References

[1] Mahmood, A., Ghani, H. U., and Gheewala, S. H. 2023. Absolute environmental sustainability assessment of rice using a planetary boundary approach. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 39:123–33. doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2023.05.016

[2] United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2022. World Population Prospects 2022: Summary of Results. UN DESA/POP/2022/TR/NO. 3. Available online at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/wpp2022_summary_of_results.pdf (Accessed Feburay 01, 2026).

[3] Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, E., et al. 2009. Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol. Soc. 14:32. doi: 10.5751/es-03180-140232

[4] International Organization for Standardization. 2006. Environmental Management - Life Cycle Assessment - Principles and Framework (ISO 14040:2006). Available online at: https://www.iso.org/standard/37456.html (Accessed Feburay 01, 2026).