Colors as Defense

Some animals have very bright colors, like red, blue, or yellow. This is not just to make them look nice! In nature, these bold colors can be part of a defense called aposematism. Aposematism is when animals use warning signals to stop predators from attacking. These signals can be visual, auditory, or chemical. When animals use visual aposematism, they often have bright—or otherwise very noticeable—colors to warn predators that they are dangerous or taste bad. Many animals use this strategy to stay safe, including snakes, frogs, bees, spiders, butterflies, salamanders, and even some mammals [1].

Aposematism works like this: when a predator attacks a poisonous or unpalatable (bad-tasting) animal, it has a very unpleasant experience. After that, it usually does not want to eat that kind of animal again. But to avoid another bad experience, the predator needs to recognize the prey in the future. That is where strong color patterns help. They make the prey easier to see, remember, and avoid. Because of this, animals with warning colors are more likely to survive. Predators learn to stay away from them.

But did you know that aposematism does not always mean bright, flashy colors? What really matters is that the animal looks different from harmless prey and stands out in its environment. For example, skunks are black and white, and some vipers have zigzag stripes. These are also warning patterns, even though bright colors are not involved.

Can Tadpoles Use Colors for Protection?

We know that adult toads, frogs, and tree frogs have toxins in their skin that can be harmful to predators. Many species signal this with very striking colors and patterns. Tadpoles also display different color patterns. During this larval stage, amphibians are most vulnerable to predation, so it makes sense to think they might use color as a way to protect themselves too. In fact, some tadpoles choose to live in places where their body color blends in with the surroundings. This is called camouflage. However, other species have colors that are easily detectable in their environments, suggesting that coloration may be linked to tadpole survival through various mechanisms [2].

Black tadpoles often stand out against the usually brown puddles where they live (Figure 1). This makes them easy to see, meaning they are not camouflaged. Some of these tadpoles—like those from common toads in the Bufonidae family—are also known to be toxic or bad tasting to predators. Because they are both easy to spot and harmful to eat, this leads to an interesting question: could black tadpoles be using aposematism to stay safe?

Some experiments with live tadpoles have tried to answer this question, but they did not get clear results [3]. One big challenge is that these studies often compare different species of tadpoles. But these species do not just differ in color—they also vary in size, shape, behavior, and even in the chemicals they produce. That makes it hard to know which of these traits are really influencing the predator’s choice. Also, some past studies used aquatic insects, like dragonfly larvae, as predators. But these insects may not rely on vision as much as birds or mammals do, so they might not respond to warning colors in the same way.

Clay Tadpoles

In our experiment to test if black tadpoles are aposematic, instead of real tadpoles (Figure 2A) we used replicas made of non-toxic modeling clay. This method has already been used successfully in other predation experiments [4]. Clay models allow us to test the effect of a single factor of interest at a time—in this case, the prey’s color. They are also efficient in provoking attacks from predators that rely on visual information to choose their prey, such as birds. This is essential for the success of an experiment on defensive coloration.

Our experiment consisted of simulating puddles containing clay tadpoles in three different colors: brown, mimicking non-toxic, camouflaged tadpoles; gray, mimicking non-toxic, non-camouflaged tadpoles; and black, mimicking toxic, easy-to-spot (potentially aposematic) tadpoles (Figure 2B). We created 10 artificial puddles using transparent, rigid plastic trays filled with clean water. Each tray had a brown background to look like a real puddle. We placed 30 clay tadpoles in each one-10 of each color. The trays were set up along the edge of a natural pond, where we had already seen birds hunting real tadpoles.

The experiment was conducted on clear to partly cloudy days during late summer. We checked the puddles daily for nine consecutive days, recording the number of clay tadpoles of each color that were predated. We considered predation only when a clay tadpole disappeared. This happens when birds swallow tadpoles whole or carry them away to be eaten elsewhere.

What Did We Discover?

At the end of the experiment, out of 300 clay tadpoles, 201 were predated: 77 brown, 88 gray, and only 36 black (Figure 3). Through statistical analysis, we proved that color was the factor explaining the different numbers of attacks on each color of clay tadpole. The black tadpoles had a higher survival rate than the brown and gray ones, suggesting that the black ones were actively avoided by predators.

Throughout the experiment, the artificial puddles remained free of insects or fish, ruling out these animals as potential predators of the clay tadpoles. We also did not detect any signs of snakes or mammals near the puddles. These predators, in any case, generally rely on chemical cues (such as smell) to detect their prey.

During our daily checks, we observed a Grayish Baywing bird (Agelaioides badius) eating a brown clay tadpole. This suggests that birds were the primary predators in this experiment. Birds are clever, have excellent color perception, and are fully capable of learning to avoid harmful prey based on coloration.

We made another interesting observation: although black replicas were attacked less overall, their predation rate noticeably increased in the final days of the study. This may have happened because, during the experiment, predators learned that black replicas were just as edible as the others. Or, as the number of “harmless” tadpoles (brown and gray) decreased over time, predators may have become more willing to take the risk of attacking the black ones.

So, Are Black Tadpoles Aposematic?

Our findings suggest that black tadpoles are aposematic! Despite being easier to see against the brown background, black tadpoles were predated less than brown or gray ones. This result suggests that predators may have learned to avoid this color based on past experiences with real black tadpoles. Since our replicas had no toxins or bad taste, color was the only factor that could explain the predators’ choices. Our study contributes to the understanding of how aposematism can be an efficient defense strategy, even in very small animals without bright colors.

Our study is the first to provide experimental evidence that black tadpoles use their coloration as a warning to deter predators. But many questions remain unanswered. Does the relative number of black tadpoles in an environment influence the effectiveness of this defense strategy? How does the efficiency of this strategy vary in different lighting conditions (e.g., open fields vs. shaded forests)? What strategy explains tadpoles with different color patterns, such as stripes or colorful spots? And, of course, there is still the challenge of testing aposematism using real, live tadpoles! In the future, exploring these questions will help us better understand how animals protect themselves in nature.

Glossary

Aposematism: ↑ A defense strategy whereby harmful prey alert their predators through signals such as colors, odors, or behaviors.

Unpalatable: ↑ Something not pleasant to taste.

Toxins: ↑ Poisons made by living things, like plants, animals, or bacteria, that can make people or animals sick if they touch, eat, or breathe them.

Larval Stage: ↑ A young life stage of some animals, like insects, when they are usually different from adults in appearance and habits.

Predation: ↑ A biological interaction in which one organism, the predator, kills and eats another organism, its prey.

Statistical Analysis: ↑ Using numbers and math to study data, find patterns, and understand what the results mean.

Conflict of Interest

The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

JA received a scientific initiation grant from CNPq during the completion of this work (grant number 146602/2022-6).

AI Tool Statement

The author(s) declared that generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript. During the preparation of this work the author(s) used ChatGPT in order to improve readability and language. After using this tool, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.